A young woman smiles while standing on a boat, holding a rope. She wears a red patterned top and a necklace. Behind her, the ocean sparkles and a green, mountainous island rises under a blue sky.

Disney’s dull, disastrous ‘Moana’ remake

Dwayne Johnson sleepwalks his way through his latest passion project

Catherine Laga'aia as Moana.

Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

When the new Moana was announced in 2023, Dwayne Johnson gave a powerful personal statement. “I wear this culture proudly on my skin and in my soul,” he said, before paying tribute to his late grandfather, High Chief Peter Maivia, the wrestling icon who inspired Johnson’s animated demigod Maui. But by the time cameras rolled a year later, something had changed. The end result is weirdly unsettling. 

Perhaps it was the passion Johnson found elsewhere in the interim—like on the set of The Smashing Machine, his image-shifting MMA drama, which shot concurrently—that made him reconsider being a live-action mascot. Maybe it was the animated Moana series being retooled into a messy sequel film. It could’ve also been something in Johnson’s personal life (he recently opened up about his heart issues around the time), but who’s to say? Whatever the case, his appearance in the new Moana is shockingly disengaged. Then again, this is also in keeping with the passionless lethargy infecting the rest of the movie.

Ten years is a blink of an eye in the animation-to-live-action-remake pipeline, and the original Moana (2016) is arguably Disney’s last bonafide princess classic. While this might explain why kids will be excited to see it—“How Far I’ll Go” does the rounds in some households as often as “Let It Go” from Frozen—what it doesn’t explain is how a studio can be satisfied with sullying a still-growing IP (the animated Moana 3 is en route) by way of such lackluster filmmaking. It’s never a good sign when you have to look at art purely as brand management just to make sense of it, but in the case of the new Moana, no other lens applies.

The story needs little introduction. Moana (Catherine Laga'aia) is the princess of Motunui—a real Polynesian island reimagined as pan-Pasifika paradise—and her Broadway-style yearning to escape coincides with a festering blight. To save her people’s crops, she needs to team up with the mischievous shapeshifter Maui (Johnson) to sail between points A, B and C and eventually return a sacred stone that he once stole from a living island. The plot is awfully linear and straightforward, but the 2016 original struck a chord with its audiovisual splendor, courtesy of some dazzling imagery and mostly great music—the less said about “Shiny,” the better—by Oceanic fusion artist Opetaia Foa'I, Tarzan composer Mark Mancina, and Hamilton bard Lin-Manuel Miranda.

These musical elements are recreated as is, so there’s little to complain about in that department. But rare are the moments when the staging complements the rhythms, the percussion, the crescendos, and what have you. Visually, this live-action facsimile goes very wrong, very quickly. It’s directed by Hamilton’s Thomas Kail, who—although he can stage a theatrical musical—has no prior experience blocking or editing a feature. This becomes immediately apparent as the camera whizzes past any and all instances of human movement, especially dance, resulting in a mechanical introduction to Moana and her allegedly vibrant island nation.

The greenery and oceanic blues are immediately dulled and flattened too. Save for one indoor scene between Moana and her sagely grandmother (Rena Owen), each physical location is awash in the uncanny disconnect of a brightly lit sound stage (even though real Hawaiian locations were used). The film is butt ugly to look at, and it’s made all the more repulsive by the retention of animated sea and land creature designs being granted tangible physical textures. We know what a real rooster looks like, so seeing Moana’s grotesque live action pet conjures thoughts of angler fish birthed from Satan’s deepest caverns. 

Laga'aia herself isn’t really a problem—she’s a talented young singer—but her performance is done no favors by the sheer nothing she’s forced to interact with, between a litany of CGI creatures, and a completely checked out co-star. Neither Moana nor Maui retain the impish sense of adventure that defined their cartoon counterparts, and from the moment Johnson arrives, the film relinquishes what little energy it had. The actor-producer delivers each quip and serious proclamation with the exact same glacial cadence, as though he wants to get things over with and retire to his trailer. Once a barrel-chested wrestler, he’s now slimmed down considerably (likely owing to those aforementioned health struggles), but is placed in a rubbery muscle suit that matches his former physique, so what you’re left with is a large man with a distractingly small head, mumbling his way through half-learned dialogue like Marlon Brando on Apocalypse Now

Two women in skirts walk along a sandy beach by the water, viewed from behind. A film camera is visible in the foreground, capturing the scene at sunset.

Behind the scenes of "Moana"

Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

It almost feels unfair to criticize Johnson, even though he’s one of Hollywood’s highest-paid leading men. A charisma vacuum this all-consuming doesn’t emerge organically from such a once-likable presence unless something has gone terribly awry. People have bad days; it happens! But the new Moana feels like the product of only bad days and nothing else. There’s a haunting sadness in Johnson’s eyes that’s hard to shake, even when he’s joking around, so the movie feels like a peek into something troubling that audiences shouldn’t be privy to—certainly not the youngins. 

I say this with love: Johnson ought to have put this off until he actually felt like showing up to set. However, that sort of suggestion doesn’t gel with a $250 million production that was already delayed by an actors’ strike; the wheels of Disney’s catalog stripmining simply must keep turning in service of its bottom line. Whatever the intentions of any individual artist working on the new Moana, the end result is—much like Disney’s “live action” Lion King movies—little more than a lifeless recreation of something once adored. The difference is: here you have a human face whose boredom radiates outward, becoming exhausting by the end.

Published on July 10, 2026

Words by Siddhant Adlakha

Siddhant Adlakha is a critic and filmmaker from Mumbai, though he now lives in New York City. They're more similar than you'd think. Find him at @SiddhantAdlakha on Twitter